OPPOSITION to the Galloway National Park is growing with a new resistance group set to have their first meeting on Tuesday.
The region beat four other Scottish areas to be the lead contender for the new national park.
And 12-month long consultation has now begun to assess its suitability and where the boundary should be drawn.
However, some residents are concerned that the negative impacts of a national park would far outweigh the positives.
It has led to the formation of the ‘No Galloway National Park’ group, which has attracted over 800 members since it was set up last Tuesday.
The group will be holding its first meeting on Tuesday night at the Mill on the Fleet in Gatehouse of Fleet from 7 pm onwards.
Giving more details, a spokesperson for the group said: “This meeting is to discuss the way ahead and see how we can push for a referendum of all those who live within the proposed park boundaries. Also, to ask for a comprehensive appraisal to be carried out of existing national parks by an independent source, not Scottish Gov or Nature Scot.”
Meanwhile, a councillor from Kintyre has expressed his fears about the challenges posed by having more National Parks in Scotland. Cllr Alastair Redman believes the current proposals “pose serious risks” to local farmers.
He said: “Expanding national parks can lead to increased regulations and restrictions on land use, which may severely hinder agricultural activities. These restrictions could result in reduced economic opportunities for those who rely on farming and crofting for their livelihoods. The traditional practices that have sustained these communities for generations might be at risk, leading to economic hardship and a loss of cultural heritage.”
Councillor Redman also highlighted the potential disruption to established communities and infrastructure, adding: “The transition to national park status could disrupt existing land management practices and place additional burdens on local authorities and landowners.
He called for transparent communication from the Scottish Government, adding: “Local communities must be fully informed and involved in the decision-making process to ensure that their interests are safeguarded.
“It is imperative these proposals are carefully considered and balanced against the needs of local communities. I urge the Scottish Government to engage in open dialogue with all affected parties and to develop a comprehensive strategy that addresses the potential challenges and ensures that the concerns of farmers, crofters, and local residents are prioritised.”
